{ "version": "https://jsonfeed.org/version/1", "title": "analog-film on 365Pixels", "icon": "https://avatars.micro.blog/avatars/2025/10/1700855.jpg", "home_page_url": "https://365pixels.xyz/", "feed_url": "https://365pixels.xyz/feed.json", "items": [ { "id": "http://365pixels.micro.blog/2026/06/24/pastel-evening.html", "title": "Pastel Evening (175/365)", "content_html": "\"Auto-generated\nNikon Z8 • 24mm • ƒ/4.0 • 1/400s • ISO 800\n

It’s raining here. It’s 104°F/40°C and raining. Real nice.

\n

Yesterday it was 113°F / 45°C, and it was miserable. From the news, it sounds like we’re not alone. The heat has settled in everywhere, and summer has arrived like a blowtorch.

\n

This is a shot from yesterday that I just got around to editing in Lightroom.

\n

Thanks for stopping by.

\n
\nClick for Stray Pixels and a Film Journey Update\n

Film Journey:\nAnother update to home digital camera film scanning. I read the user manual for Negative Lab Pro and its scanning recommendations, and I tried a second batch of scans. I think they turned out much better. I’ll show a couple of shots from yesterday’s post, plus a few more, that show the difference between the lab scans and my scans. It surprised me and made me realize that the lab isn’t always the best.

\n

I will say that color scans are the hardest. B&W is pretty darn easy; there is no white balance to deal with, and you’re basically just adjusting brightness, contrast, black clip, and white clip, unless you use toning.

\n

I’m most surprised at the sunset pictures. The lab scans came out really dark, and I thought I had just screwed up my metering, which metering for that shot is tough with the bright sky and dark street, but I wasn’t even going to process those shots, and I’m glad I did. When I scanned them and used Negative Lab Pro with just standard settings, they were not that dark at all. It just shows me that whoever scans your pictures, they, or the software, is making a judgment call on your negative. I think I’d rather be making those decisions.

\n

I’m rather enjoying the process and creative outlet. Looking forward to getting some good pictures to work with now.

\n

Of note, I’ve been using Negative Lab Pro for negative conversions, but I just found another way from CineStill Film. They have LR, PS, and ACR presets that do the conversion. I downloaded them, but havent haven’t had a chance to play with them yet.

\n

The first seven shots are professional lab scans from my local lab. The next seven are my scans. Ignore the quality of the shots, I just wanted to shoot a couple of rolls of film to test the Rolleiflex and my metering. You can compare them yourself. I’m working on getting that cool image reveal slider on my blog, but it’s a bit more complex than I thought. It would be nice to have the slider and see the lab scan vs my scan in the same shot. Hopefully soon.

\n

The learning continues!

\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
Pro Lab Scan - Portra 400
\n
\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
Pro Lab Scan - Portra 400
\n
\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
Pro Lab Scan - Portra 400
\n
\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
Pro Lab Scan - Portra 400
\n
\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
Pro Lab Scan - Ilford HP5 400
\n
\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
Pro Lab Scan - Ilford HP5 400
\n
\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
Pro Lab Scan - Ilford HP5 400
\n
\n

My second try with new knowledge and tweaks to the software and camera settings.

\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
My Digital Camera Scans - Negative Lab Pro Software - Portra 400
\n
\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
My Digital Camera Scans - Negative Lab Pro Software - Portra 400
\n
\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
My Digital Camera Scans - Negative Lab Pro Software - Portra 400
\n
\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
My Digital Camera Scans - Negative Lab Pro Software - Portra 400
\n
\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
My Digital Camera Scans - Negative Lab Pro Software - Ilford HP5 400
\n
\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
My Digital Camera Scans - Negative Lab Pro Software - Ilford HP5 400
\n
\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
My Digital Camera Scans - Negative Lab Pro Software - Ilford HP5 400
\n
\n
\n", "date_published": "2026-06-24T17:00:25-07:00", "url": "https://365pixels.xyz/2026/06/24/pastel-evening.html", "tags": ["Nikon","2026","Stray-Pixels","analog-film"] }, { "id": "http://365pixels.micro.blog/2026/06/23/texture.html", "title": "Texture (174/365) ", "content_html": "\"Auto-generated\n

Sad day for taking photos, but a good day on the film scanning front!

\n

More down in Stray Pixels about the film journey.

\n
\nClick for Stray Pixels\n

Film Journey:

\n

Today was mostly an office day to see if I could do my own scans of my negatives and get them close to the professional lab results.

\n

I’m going to post the professional lab scans, then my camera scans. My goal is to be able to scan my own negatives and at least come close to lab-quality. I know labs vary widely, and I only have one lab to compare to right now, but I don’t think mine are that bad, especially for my first attempt. There is a pretty steep learning curve, and I’m sure I’ll get better as I learn more and practice. Please ignore the photo content; these were test shots to make sure my grandfather’s Rollei was still working, and my light metering technique was working. I was just shooting random stuff around the house. Oh, and ignore the dust! My word, the dust on my black-and-white negatives was horrible. I’m going to have to be way more careful in the future.

\n

I’m also going to have to decide where I’m going to document my film journey. Here in Stray Pixels, or I should probably just make a proper page over on Cliff538.com. I will give this some thought.

\n

The last photo is a Vlads Test Target. It’s a simple concept that works really well for testing sharpness, especially in the photo corners. Setting up your camera and film scanner so that everything is straight and parallel is really important. Then figure out which aperture setting on your lens gives you the best focus, especially in the corners. I was using f/8 on my lens, and there is some softness in the corners. This warrants some testing with other apertures.

\n

I used my Nikon Z8 with an MC 105/2.8 lens and a Valoi 360 system. Processed with LightRoom Classic and Negative Lab Pro.

\n

All shots taken with a Rolleiflex. The color film was Kodak Portra 400, and the B&W was Ilford HP5 400.

\n
\n\t\"\"\n\t
Professional Lab Scan
\n
\n
\n\t\"\"\n\t
Professional Lab Scan
\n
\n
\n\t\"\"\n\t
Professional Lab Scan
\n
\n
\n\t\"\"\n\t
My First Attempt at Scanning
\n
\n
\n\t\"\"\n\t
My First Attempt at Scanning
\n
\n
\n\t\"\"\n\t
My First Attempt at Scanning
\n
\n
\n\t\"\"\n\t
My First Attempt at Scanning
\n
\n
\n\t\"\"\n\t
Vlad's Test Target
\n
\n
\n", "date_published": "2026-06-23T19:04:17-07:00", "url": "https://365pixels.xyz/2026/06/23/texture.html", "tags": ["iPhone","2026","Stray-Pixels","analog-film"] }, { "id": "http://365pixels.micro.blog/2026/06/17/what-a-cute-couple.html", "title": "What A Cute Couple (168/365)", "content_html": "\"Auto-generated\n

My morning bird shots will be coming to a close for the Summer. It’s bloody hot in the mornings now, and I’m not happy about it. One of life’s true little pleasures for me is sitting outside in the morning watching the birds with my coffee and camera.

\n

This nice couple gave me a few shots this morning. As you can see, the female is in focus, but the male, not so much. My shallow depth of field bit me. My plane of focus was so narrow that their being offset just a touch was enough to throw the male out of focus. But it’s my shot of the day nonetheless.

\n

Film Journey: Got my first roll of Portra 400 back from the lab today. These would be the first pictures taken with my Grandfathers Rolleiflex in over 40 years, I believe. I didn’t take the time to take good photos because I just wanted to make sure the camera was working, didn’t have light leaks, and that my light metering technique was at least in the ballpark. (Grandpa Leamer, your beautiful Rollei still takes great pictures…)

\n

Still waiting on the Ilford B&W negatives/scans.

\n

Down in Stray Pixels, I’ll put the one shot that is even slightly worth showing. I’m very happy with my exposure and with the sharpness. Love that tight grain. But, boy, did I have to straighten the photos. There is a learning curve dealing with a waist-level viewfinder!

\n

If you’re a film person, you’ll laugh at my observations, but I haven’t shot film since high school and college. It’s funny to me that I’ve been shooting digitally and using film emulation on some shots. Then I get these scans back and stare at them, thinking, “This is the real deal, real Kodak Portra, no simulation needed.”

\n

Photography is a funny thing these days. Digital, film, emulations, filters, recipes, A.I., apps. Even shooting film and scanning negatives to make them digital so you can post them is funny to me. You take negatives, scan them, and then you can still tweak to some degree, colors, brightness, sharpness, etc. Are they film shots still? (That’s rhetorical). You have purists who think most of this is sacrilegious.

\n

I’m not in any camp. I love photography. I don’t care how you do it. In fact, tell me how you do it. Tell me your process. I’m curious about your art and how you make it. It’s yours. Don’t let anybody tell you your art is less than because you don’t follow their rules. We all have our preferences and beliefs. I respect yours, and maybe I’ll even adopt some of yours if they make sense to me. I always try to follow the mantra of “Strong Opinions, Loosely Held.” Be open to change, to new data, to new ideas. It will make you a better person and photographer.

\n

I’m really enjoying my photography journey these days. Digital shooting, Rolleiflex, (BeerPan coming someday (35mm Pano)), printing, film, negatives, scanning, it’s just all really interesting and fun exploring as much as I can. Heck, I’m watching a very in-depth Large Format Photography course right now, and there may be even more variety in the future. I’m just say’n: the 4x5 and 6x17 stuff looks awfully fun.

\n

Anyway, I’m babbling now. Go take some pictures.

\n
\nClick for Stray Pixels\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
Rolleiflex. Portra 400.
\n
\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
Same Photo. Processed Black & White in LR
\n
\n
\n", "date_published": "2026-06-17T17:33:23-07:00", "url": "https://365pixels.xyz/2026/06/17/what-a-cute-couple.html", "tags": ["Nikon","2026","Stray-Pixels","analog-film"] }, { "id": "http://365pixels.micro.blog/2026/06/11/peace.html", "title": "Peace (162/365) ", "content_html": "\"Auto-generated\n

Short drive tonight on some errands, and when I drove past this, I knew I had to capture it. I turned around, parked, and hiked to a good spot to take in this peaceful scene. A good reason to always have your camera with you.

\n

Nikon Z8 • 125mm • 1/125s • f/2.8 • ISO 5000

\n

Film Journey:\nI shot a roll of Portra 400 tonight on some sunset shots with the Rollei. I don’t have a cable release for it, so I ordered one on eBay tonight. I had it on a tripod, but who knows how shaky I am when pressing and releasing the shutter with my finger in Bulb Mode. No instant results—just have to wait and find out. Another roll of exposed film in the refrigerator. When I get back from my next work trip, I’m going to try a local lab for developing and scanning. I think I’m set up to scan my own negatives now, but I want some lab scans to compare mine to.

\n

This Rollei that I’m using has a lot of meaning for me. It was my grandfather’s; he was an avid photographer and very active in his local photography club up in the Pacific Northwest. I loved spending time with him in his office, looking at slides on the light table. I want to keep his camera shooting film for many years. It’s been a long, slow journey back into film for me, but progress is happening.

\n

The next roll to experiment with is Kodak Ektar 100. It’s supposed to have very fine grain and vibrant colors. Excited to see it.

\n
\nClick for Stray Pixels\n
\n\t\"Auto-generated\n\t
4x6 Test Print of yesterday's photo on ILFORD Gold Fiber Rag. I like it.
\n
\n
\n", "date_published": "2026-06-11T20:41:52-07:00", "url": "https://365pixels.xyz/2026/06/11/peace.html", "tags": ["Nikon","2026","analog-film"] } ] }